America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing Trump’s comments in the BIDEN ISRAEL LEAK

Rumble.com/Nicholas J Fuentes/com.nickjfuentes

Deus vult intensifies

America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing the bombshell Vanity Fair piece exposing Compact Magazine which recently published a hitpiece against Chris Brunet and the Groypers

Rumble.com/Nicholas J Fuentes/com.nickjfuentes

Going live on Kick at 6pm CT (20minutes)

Kick.com/nickfuentes

Live on Kick

Kick.com/nickfuentes

America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing Heritage Foundation’s plot to arrest all antisemites called Project Esther

Rumble.com/Nicholas J Fuentes/com.nickjfuentes

Going to cover the Trump x JRE podcast tonight

America First is LIVE covering Trump on the Joe Rogan Experience

Rumble.com/Nicholas J Fuentes/com.nickjfuentes

#demisux 🐸

America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally and Israel’s strike on Iran

Rumble.com/Nicholas J Fuentes/com.nickjfuentes

Lately I have started to notice a striking similarity between some of the arguments used by the Alt Right and basic conservatives against the Left.

Alt Righters like Steven Sailer believe that racial disparities arise from "human biodiversity" (HBD), a euphemism for genetic differences, especially differences in average intelligence, between the races.

Conservatives like Ben Shapiro quietly acknowledge genetic differences between the races, but tend to focus on cultural differences, specifically a "victimhood mentality," which prevents underperforming races from adopting better cultural practices.

Moreover, the conservatives talk about a political hierarchy based on historical victimhood and the Left's preoccupation with categorizing groups as oppressed or oppressor based on power dynamics.

On the surface, both of these alternative hypotheses to the Left's ideological belief in "systemic racism" appear to defend the merit of white males and their preeminence in the world.

But beneath the surface, it is obvious that these arguments have a powerful "dual use" in buttressing the legitimacy of Jewish Power against charges of nepotism or conspiracy.

The conversation is also always about income, which is supposedly earned through labor, innovation, and entrepreneurship, but never about wealth and power, which controls the flow of money and is subject to different rules and considerations.

The narrative from types like Sailer and Shapiro goes something like this: Jews circumstantially have all of the power, because they have all of the wealth, because they earned it through merit, because they have better genes or culture than anyone else.

But if Jews operate collectively and transnationally as opposed to individually and locally, is their wealth and clout the fruit of their entrepreneurship or their highly networked, combined power?

Moreover, maybe we are okay with a class of people earning a better living through their industry but are the privileged and powerful positions such as admissions offices in Ivy League universities really "earned," or are they dispensed?

And concerning power as opposed to income, are there no considerations other than merit? Would we let Chinese nationals run our society if they appeared to "earn it" by becoming wealthy capitalists?

Ironically, it is the all-powerful "white males" who are ceaselessly attacked for their privilege, while simultaneously being the only group that nobody fears attacking.

At the same time, we all know what happens to anyone who remotely insinuates that Jews wield power or casts aspersions on how it was accumulated. Jews sit atop both the victimhood hierarchy and the power matrix.

Jews attack White Nationalists for collectivizing and call them "just as bad" as the nonwhites collectivizing against them. Meanwhile, they operate innumerable Jewish federations, councils, and congresses worldwide.

Thus— any ideological system that espouses limitless individualism as "merit" is truly an ideology that enslaves its believers to powerful groups who collectivize.

Whether you call it a "melting pot" or a "colorblind meritocracy," the effect is the same— we allow foreigners to rule us because it's "fair," and you're not allowed to question it.

America First is LIVE! Tonight we are discussing Washington Post and Kamala

Rumble.com/Nicholas J Fuentes/com.nickjfuentes

John McEntee from Project 2025/DateRightStuff is a Trump loyalist from the 2016 campaign. He was brought in to clean house as head of PPO at the beginning of 2020.

Project 2025 compiled a database of ~15,000 loyalists to staff the Trump admin but was outmaneuvered by Brooke Rollins’ America First Policy Institute (AFPI). Rollins is a Kushner loyalist.

BAPtards amplify attacks on McEntee and Project 2025 to solidify Vance and Kushner’s control over hiring in the next admin.